skip navigation
Home  |  About Us  |  Accessibility  |  CRIN Quiz  |  FAQs  |  Contact Us
CRIN - Child Rights Information Network
 
Children's rights
Information by country
CRIN Themes
 

Print this pageJUVENILE JUSTICE: Toolkit on Diversion and Alternatives to Detention

Date:

03/11/2010

Organisation:

UNICEF

Resource type:

Training Materials


Web link http://www.unicef.org/tdad/index_55653.html


Diversion from judicial proceedings and alternatives to detention are essential focus areas for those working on reforming justice systems to ensure the protection of the rights of children in conflict with the law in conformity with the Convention on the Rights of the Child - Articles 37(b), 40.1, 40.3(b) and 40.4. Diversion and alternatives are therefore often prioritised in UNICEF's work.

This toolkit provides clear, user-friendly guidance and practical tools for UNICEF Child Protection Specialists and others working in this important field.

• It covers both theory and practice.
• It clarifies what diversion and alternatives are.
• It explains in detail why they are important.
• It provides practical guidance on how to implement diversion and alternatives using a systemic approach based on UNICEF's Protective Environment Framework and the UN Common Approach to Justice for Children.
• It gathers together project examples and other resources from a range of countries for easy reference.

Using this toolkit will enable readers to gain a better understanding of diversion and alternatives to detention and to access a range of resources to assist with practical implementation.

Quick definitions:

Diversion:
Diversion means channeling children in conflict with the law away from judicial proceedings through the development and implementation of procedures or programmes that enable many - possibly most - to avoid the potential negative effects of formal judicial proceedings, provided that human rights and legal safeguards are fully respected.

Alternatives to detention: refers to measures that may be imposed on children who are being formally processed though the criminal justice system, at both pre-trial and sentencing stages, that do not involve deprivation of liberty.

Important note
This toolkit adopts a perspective firmly grounded in child rights and child protection. However, this perspective is compatible with the main objectives of the criminal justice system overall (to prevent crime and to create a peaceful, law-abiding society). The toolkit also addresses issues of accountabilty, and the perspectives of victims/survivors and community safety. The toolkit is therefore relevant to all those involved in crime prevention and justice, not just those specialising in children's issues. It is acknowledged that in case by case situations relating to diversion and alternatives, the best interests of the child need to be balanced against the interests of victims/suvivors and society in general. These issues are discussed further in the following sections:

• 'Public safety & recidivism / What is the purpose of the criminal justice system?' (internal link to resource page)
• 'Restorative justice - definition and discussion' (internal link to resource page)

The introduction section is divided into 2 parts:

A. About the toolkit
This gives an overview of the aims and intended audience of the toolkit and how to use the toolkit.

B. The bigger picture
This shows how diversion and alternatives to detention fit into the broader context of UNICEF's Child Protection Strategy - notably the 'Protective Environment Framework'. It also examines the place of diversion and alternatives within the context of justice for children as a whole. Finally, it takes a brief look at other relevant UN and regional initiatives.

Previous Training Materials items


Organisation Contact Details:

UNICEF
H-9, 3 United Nations
Plaza,
New York, NY 10017
Tel: + 1 212 326 7000
Email: devpro@unicef.org
Website: www.unicef.org

Last updated 03/11/2010 02:59:10

Please note that these reports are hosted by CRIN as a resource for Child Rights campaigners, researchers and other interested parties. Unless otherwise stated, they are not the work of CRIN and their inclusion in our database does not necessarily signify endorsement or agreement with their content by CRIN.

Have your sayHave your say!

Be the first to have your say! Do you have something to say about this item? Get it off your chest, by posting some feedback.

Click here to view feedback for all items.

RSS FeedRSS feed for this item