GENEVA (18 November 2013) - Azerbaijan, Nicaragua and Nigeria are among the countries the United Nations Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture (SPT) plans to visit in 2014, the rights body has announced.

The SPT’s role is to prevent and eliminate torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment and punishment of detainees. It works with national governments that have ratified the Optional Protocol to the UN Convention against Torture (OPCAT).

The SPT will also conduct missions next year to Ecuador, Malta, Netherlands and Togo, and plans a follow-up to a previously visited country. Following previous practice, some of the SPT’s visits will focus on providing advice and assistance to national preventive mechanisms, which are bodies that themselves monitor places of detention.  

In addition, the SPT will also conduct a broad range of visits to places of detention, as well as short missions that will focus on advising the national authorities on how to best to comply with their OPCAT obligations.

“For the SPT, the key to preventing torture and ill-treatment lies in building constructive relations between national and international bodies within the OPCAT framework,” said Chairperson Malcolm Evans after the SPT’s latest session held in Geneva from 11 to 15 November.

“We have seen many real, positive developments as a result of this approach, and we are committed to bringing the benefits of becoming partners in prevention to all States parties as soon as we can,” he said.  

This is why, Mr Evans explained, the SPT is devising more ways of fulfilling its convention mandate, which not only grants it unrestricted access to all kinds of places of detention in countries that have ratified the OPCAT, but also calls on it to work closely with national, regional and other international mechanisms involved in the prevention of torture.  

“As a result of the OPCAT and the work of the SPT, systems for regular visits to places of detention as part of international efforts to prevent torture are now a reality in more than 50 states,” he added.

“The SPT is at the centre of this international framework of independent torture prevention mechanisms and we need to become ever more closely involved in encouraging and supporting all those involved in this work, at whatever level,” Mr Evans said.

Background:

The Optional Protocol on the Prevention of Torture has to date been ratified by 70 countries.

During a country mission, the SPT delegation visits places of deprivation of liberty. At the end of the visit, the SPT communicates its recommendations and observations to the State by means of a confidential report, and if necessary to NPMs. However, State parties are encouraged to request that the SPT makes these reports public.

The SPT also reserves the right to amend its plan of work should the circumstances so require, and will inform the State party or national preventive mechanism as soon as is practical.

Find out more about the Optional Protocol: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cat/opcat/index.htm

Further Information:

Over 40 countries still legally allow for the inhuman sentencing of children, which includes criminal sentences of death, life imprisonment and corporal punishment. These amount to torture. Click here for CRIN's campaign to end inhuman sentencing of children. 

Previous CHR News items

• 14/11/2013: TRANSPARENCY: UN Human Rights Council elections
• 05/10/2013: HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL: Special Procedure appointments in 2014
• 07/03/2013: UN: UN expert in human rights and counter-terrorism asks for truth and accountability
• 29/04/2011: UN: Human Rights Council passes resolution on Syria in Special Session
• 21/04/2011: UN: Syria should not be allowed on UN Human Rights Council, rights groups urge

Organisation Contact Details:

UN - United Nations
Public Inquiries Unit
United Nations
GA-57
New York, NY 10017
Tel: +1 212 963 4475
Email: inquiries@un.org
Website: www.un.org

Last updated 19/11/2013 12:08:04

Please note that these reports are hosted by CRIN as a resource for Child Rights campaigners, researchers and other interested parties. Unless otherwise stated, they are not the work of CRIN and their inclusion in our database does not necessarily signify endorsement or agreement with their content by CRIN.